reading in bed was immoral

Holding a book on the bedside table, taking a book in his own bed, until the 18th century was considered a real vice, a habit for depraved. And it was also a threat to property, a cause of fires, tragic deaths and atrocities, a practice that was almost synonymous with death-by-fire because it required candles.

But reading in bed was controversial partly because it was unprecedented. Until then reading had been a shared activity and to be performed strictly aloud, so that in his Confessions Augustine notices the strangeness of St. Ambrose reading “while his voice was silent and his tongue was still. ”

Visiting Time Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images

Reading before sleep was a privilege, a prerogative of who was literate, had books available, and, above all, had the chance to be in a room alone during the night. The printing invention transformed silent reading into a common practice thus giving rise to a new concept of privacy. Up until then, the bedroom was one of the crucial points of court life both day and night: the nobles used to sleep in rooms that housed servants and company ladies too.

Now being alone in a room created dangerous opportunities for transgression: the traditionalists considered solitary readings as an activity that could attack the community and the collective moral order. In his Solitary Sex, a story of masturbation, historian Thomas Laqueur writes:  “Novels, like masturbation, created for women’s alternative” companions of their pillow “.


Reading in Bed gifEnjoy more about Reading in Bed on the long article on The Atlantic